← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/22802/2022ordered

Sabin v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-12-22Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 22/12/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Sabin, ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Eraniel Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

(Crime No.601/2022).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s. Rajesh.P, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottaichamy, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory bail in Cr No.601/2022 on the file of the respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/A1 who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 341,294 (b),323,506(i) of IPC in Crime No.601 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution as per the de-facto complainant is that due to previous enmity the petitioner herein waylaid the defacto complainant, abused and also assaulted him and also threatened him with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and a false case has been foisted against him. He would further submit that the petitioner apprehends assault by the defacto complainant if he goes to Eraniel Court. Hence, he 1/3

prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit due to previous enmity the petitioner herein way the defacto complainant, abused and also assaulted him and also threatened with dire consequences. He would also submit that the petitioner and the defacto complainant are close relatives.

5. Heard. Perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valliyur on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m.,for a period of four weeks and thereafter on every Saturday at 10.30 am., until further orders. [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. 2/3

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

sd/- 22/12/2022 / TRUE COPY / /01/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

AAV TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VALLIYUR.

2 DO THROUGH:

THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANNIYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ERANIEL POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.P.RAJESH, Advocate ( SR-15453[I] dated 23/12/2022 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.22802 of 2022 Date :22/12/2022 PKP/VR/SAR-1/03.01.2023/3P/6C 3/3