← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/16501/2025dismissed

Murugan @ Bargili Murugan v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

2026-03-03Honourable Mr Justice K.K. Ramakrishnan4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 03.03.2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE. K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN CRL.OP.(MD).No.16501 of 2025 Murugan @ Bargili Murugan ... Petitioner Vs.

The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Inspector of Police, PEW - Thiruverambur Police Station, Trichy.

(Crime No.49 of 2025) ... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar For Respondent : Mr.B.Nambi Selvan Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER in all cases :- For Bail in Crime No. 49 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER: The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 19.03.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 8(C) r/w 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act, 1985, in Crime No.49 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

1/4

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 19.03.2025, while the respondent police was conducting a vehicle check on the Trichy-Chennai bypass road near the Kariyamangalam, two individuals were found standing with trolley bags. Upon seeing the police, they attempted to escape from the spot. However, the respondent police apprehended them. During the enquiry, it was observed that the petitioner/A3, who was standing near the place of occurrence and monitoring the situation, tried to flee away from the scene, but, however, he was also apprehended by the respondent police. The enquiry of the apprehended accused revealed that the 1st accused, who is the son of the petitioner/A3, was found in possession of 11 kg of ganja, and the 2nd accused was found in possession of 11.800 kg of ganja. In total, 21.800 kg of ganja were seized from their bags.

Hence, the present case. 3.Earlier the petitioner approached this Court. This petitioner and other accused found in possession of 21.800 kilogram of ganja i.e.,commercial quantity. This Court on 22.08.2025 passed a detailed order and also considering the previous antecedents of 7 cases, dismissed the bail application. There is a specific finding that the petitioner has not satisfied the ingredients of Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

2/4

4.In view of the above this Court finds no change of circumstances to entertain this petition. This petition is liable to be dismissed. 5.Accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed. 03.03.2026 TM To 1.The Additional District and Sessions Court, Special Court for E.C. and NDPS Act Cases, Pudukkottai.

2.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Trichy. 3.The Inspector of Police, PEW - Thiruverambur Police Station, Trichy.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN,J TM

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.16501 of 2025 Date : 03.03.2026 4/4