Madhupandian v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 23/12/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Madhupandian ... Petitioner/Accused No.2 Vs The State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Thilagar Thidal Police Station, Madurai City, Madurai.

Cr.No.918/2022.

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Karunanidhi.R, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.M.Veeranthiran, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 918/2022 on the file of the Respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/A2 who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147,148,294(b)323,448 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.918 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution as per the de-facto complainant is that due to property dispute the petitioner along with other accused have trespassed into the defacto complainant's shop and looted away some tyres. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and a false case has been foisted against him. He would further submit that it is a case and case in counter there was only a civil dispute between the parties. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 1/3

4. The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner is a habitual offender and against him seven previous cases are pending, hence he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.In reply the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that majority of the complaints are given by the sister-in-law and other than that one case is pending under Section 498(A) of IPC and two cases have been referred as Mistake of Fact.

6. Heard. Perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report.

7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that it is a case and case in counter, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

8. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m. and 5.30 pm., until further orders. [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. 2/3

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

sd/- 23/12/2022 / TRUE COPY / /01/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

AAV TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, MADURAI.

2. DO-THROUGH : THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THILAGAR THIDAL POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY, MADURAI.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.R.KARUNANIDHI, Advocate ( SR-15495[I] dated 23/12/2022 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.22938 of 2022 Date :23/12/2022 USK/SSS/SAR-III/03.01.2023/3P/6C 3/3