Kaliappan C v. The District Revenue Officer
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.11.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P(MD)No.25669 of 2025 and W.M.P(MD)No.20103 of 2025 C.Kaliappan ... Petitioner Vs
1. The District Revenue Officer, Karur District, Karur.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur Revenue Division, Karur.
3. The Tahsildar, Karur Taluk, Karur District.
4.R.Kandasamy ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent vide his proceedings in Pa.Mu.C1/10073/2025 dated 07.08.2025 and quash the same as illegal and ultra-vires and consequently directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents to issue separate patta in respect of SF No.873/2A to an extent of 33 1/2 cents and further to issue joint patta in respect of 5 cents in SF No.873/1B situated at 1/4
Thanthoni Village, Karur Taluk and District in the joint names of the petitioner and the 4th respondent.
For Petitioner : M/s.A.N.Ramanathan For Respondents : Mr.B.Saravanan Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr.P.Santhana Krishnan for R4
ORDER
An order dated 07.08.2025 rejecting the revision petition filed by the petitioner is challenged in this writ petition.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner relates to an error that occurred during the UDR period. Therefore, notwithstanding the rejection of the revision under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Patta Passbook Act, 1983, he makes a request that the petitioner be permitted to file a petition requesting for correction of UDR error under G.O.Ms.No.385. Learned counsel for the 4th respondent has no objection to this course of action.
3. Learned Special Government Pleader submits that if such request were to be made, it would be considered and disposed of on merits. 2/4
4. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's assertion that there is an UDR error, this writ petition is disposed of by leaving it open to the petitioner to approach the District Revenue Officer seeking correction of UDR errors. If the petitioner files an application in that regard, the District Revenue Officer shall consider and dispose of the same on merits notwithstanding the rejection of the revision petition by order dated 07.08.2025. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
27.11.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No RJR To
1. The District Revenue Officer, Karur District, Karur.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur Revenue Division, Karur.
3. The Tahsildar, Karur Taluk, Karur District.
3/4
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
RJR W.P(MD)No.25669 of 2025 27.11.2025 4/4