Kaleeswaran v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.11.2023 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Kaleeswaran ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Parthibanur Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

4.Mannar Marutu Pandiyar Ilaingar Peravai, represented by its President, K.M.K.Natarajan, Keelaparuthiyur Village, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a writ or order or direction or in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to forbear the fourth respondent organization and its members from conducting the 1/5

Kattapomman Nadagam on event of Mamannar Maruthu Pandiar Guru Poojai Vizha on 11.11.2023 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 08.11.2023.

For Petitioner :Mr.S.Jeyakarthik For Respondents :Mr.R.M.Anbunithi 1 to 3 Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side)

O R D E R

This writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to forbear the fourth respondent organization and its members from conducting the Kattapomman Nadagam on event of Mamannar Maruthu Pandiar Guru Poojai Vizha on 11.11.2023 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 08.11.2023.

2.Mr.R.M.Anbunithi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) takes notice for the respondents 1 to 3. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner belongs to Keelaparuthiyur Village. In his village, there 2/5

are 2 sangams namely 1.Mamannar Maruthu Pandiar Vishnu Peravai and 2.Mamannar Maruthu Pandiar Ilangnar Peravai. He further submitted that the fourth respondent's Sangam without discussing with the villagers, on their own decided to conduct Kattapomma Nadagam on event of the Mamannar Maruthu Pandiar Guru Poojai on 11.11.2023. The fourth respondent's sangam are creating social disharmony in his locality. Hence, the petitioner has sent a representation on 08.11.2023 to the respondents 1 to 3. Since no order was passed, the writ petitioner has come before this Court for the above said relief. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 submitted that because of some rivalry between the petitioner and the fourth respondent Sangam, the petitioner has sent a representation to the respondents 1 to 3. 5.The negative mandamus cannot be issued. If the petitioner got any grievance over the representation made by the fourth respondent, he can appear before the third respondent and make objections. 3/5

6.Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed. 10.11.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No vsg To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Parthibanur Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

G.ILANGOVAN, J vsg 4/5

Order made in Dated 10.11.2023 5/5