← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/15547/2025granted

Parimalarkkan v. The State Of Tamilnadu, Rep. By The Inspector Of Police,

2025-09-18Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 18.09.2025 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD)No.15547 of 2025

1. S.Parimalarkkan 2.Sivagami 3.S.Balan@ Sivabalan ... Petitioners Vs.

The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Alanganallur Police Station Madurai District (Crime No.295 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.AK.Azagarsami For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Abul kalaam Azad Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No.295 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

ORDER: The Court made the following order :- 1/6

The petitioners/Accused, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 108 of BNS in Crime No.295 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2.A1 is the husband of the deceased.A2 is the mother of A1, A3 is the daughter of A1. A4 is the husband of A3. The case of the prosecution is that the marriage between A1 and the deceased took place in the year 2014 and at the time of marriage the defacto complainant presented 90 sovereigns of gold jewels, two wheeler and house hold articles and out of the wedlock they have no issues. The accused persons tortured the deceased After few days of marriage the defacto complainant started constructing a house for his daughter, however the continued harassment.. The accused persons compelled the deceased to agree for sale of house. As the deceased refused for selling the house A1 filed HMOP before the Family Court and arranged for second marriage. The deceased after coming to know about the same committed suicide writing suicide note mentioning the name of the accused persons Hence, the complaint.

2/6

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and they not committed any offence. He seeks this Court to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side)appearing for the respondent would submit that the deceased committed suicide due to the harassment made by the accused persons by leaving a suicide note, wherein she has mentioned the names of all the accused person., thereby he would oppose for grant of anticipatory bail. However he fairly submitted that the main accused was granted bail by this Court.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking into consideration the fact that the co-accused was granted bail by this Court,this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only)each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial 3/6

Magistrate, Vadipatti within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on further conditions that: [a]the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity; [b]the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

[c]the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d]the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

18.09.2025 aav 4/6

To

1. The Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti 2.The Inspector of Police, Alanganallur Police Station Madurai District 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

S.SRIMATHY,J aav

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.15547 of 2025 Date : 18.09.2025 6/6