← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/25565/2025withdrawn dismissed

A.Ajisha Begam v. The District Collector

2025-09-17Honourable Dr Justice Anita Sumanth,Honourable Mr. Justice C.Kumarappan5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.09.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN and W.M.P(MD)No.20007 of 2025 A.Ajisha Begam ... Petitioner /Vs./ 1.The District Collector, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

3.Thasildhar, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

4.Block Development Officer, Aranthangi Panchayath Union, Aranthangi , Pudukkottai District.

... Respondents 1/5

PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 to 4 to submit report to the first respondent based on the proceedings issued by him in Na.Ka.E.3337193/2025/T2 dated 20.05.2025 and thereby to pass orders it by the first respondent within the time limit stipulated by this Court and till such time the order passed by the third respondent in Na.Ka.480/2024/A5 dated 01.09.2025 be kept in abeyance. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Gurunathan For RR 1 to 3 : Mr.M.Sarangan Additional Government Pleader For R - 4 : Mr.S.P.Maharajan Special Government Pleader

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to file a revision before the Revisional Authority. He had also made an endorsement to this effect. 2.In light of the endorsement made, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a revision 2/5

and stay application. If filed, within a period of one week from today, the same shall be taken on file by the Revisional Authority without reference to limitation, but ensuring compliance with all other statutory conditions, if any.

3.The petitioner seeks to take advantage of the fact that a representation was made by a family member, proposing an exchange of the land in question with alternate land, which he states, has been encroached by the State. That proposal has been forwarded to the higher authorities. In our mind, this would prima facie establish the element of encroachment by the petitioner herself.

[A.S.M.J.,] & [C.K.J.,] 17.09.2025 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes ps 3/5

To 1.The District Collector, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

3.Thasildhar, Aranthangi Taluk, Pudukkottai District.

4.Block Development Officer, Aranthangi Panchayath Union, Aranthangi , Pudukkottai District.

4/5

DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.

AND C.KUMARAPPAN, J.

ps 17.09.2025 5/5