← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/21004/2024closed

Senthilkumar v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

2025-03-26Honourable Mr. Justice P.Dhanabal4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :26.03.2025 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Crl.O.P.(MD) No.21004 of 2024

1. Senthilkumar

2. Sweetha ... petitioners Vs.

1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Commissioner of Police, Madurai City.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Madurai North, Madurai City.

3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Sellur Range, Madurai City.

4. The Inspector of Police, (Law and Order), Kudal Pudur Police Station, Madurai City.

5. Pirimiladevi

6. Rengarajan

...Respondents

Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to direct the 1 to 4 respondents to not to harass the petitioners in the guise of enquiry on the basis of the false 1/4

compliant given by 5th respondent.

For Petitioners : Mr.N.V.Thangadurai For R1 to R4 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioners to direct the respondents no.1 to 4 not to harass the petitioners in the guise of enquiry on the basis of the false compliant given by 5th respondent.

2. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents no.1 to 4 would submit that there is a dispute between the petitioners and the respondents no.5 and 6 in respect of tenancy dispute and the enquiry is pending. For enquiry purpose, they called the petitioners and the 4th respondent has not harassed the petitioners as alleged by them and they will complete the enquiry within one week.

3. Considering the limited prayer sought for in this petition, this Court even without issuing notice to the respondents no.5 and 6 inclined to pass orders,.

4. According to the petitioners, the respondents no.1 to 4 harassed the 2/4

petitioners, but the respondents no.1 to 4 denied the allegations and based on the complaint given by the 5th respondent, they called the petitioners for enquiry. Therefore, recording the above said submissions of the 4th respondent, this criminal original petition is closed. 26.03.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes To

1. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Madurai North, Madurai City.

3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Sellur Range, Madurai City.

4. The Inspector of Police, (Law and Order), Kudal Pudur Police Station, Madurai City.

5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

P. DHANABAL , J.

Mac 26.03.2025 4/4