R.K. Srinivasan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Second day of February Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.17429 of 2013 R.K. SRINIVASAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SANKARANKOIL TOWN POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2013) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.R.ANAND Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 IPC in unknown crime number of 2013 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. On reading of the petition, it is clear that no regular case has been registered and only a petition enquiry is pending. It appears that the complainant and the accused have entered into an agreement for managing a Mineral Water Plant, in which a dispute arose and the allegations essentially appears to be civil in nature. 3.Considering the fact that the allegations against the petitioner appears to be civil in nature, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankovil, Tirunelveli District on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police twice a day at 10:30 a.m., in the morning and 06:30 p.m., in the evening for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

[b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. sd/- 02/02/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SANKARANKOVIL, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SANKARANKOIL TOWN POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 4.THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

RL/5 C- 5/2/2015

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17429 of 2013 Date :02/02/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/