Madras High CourtWP(MD)/29043/2024closed

R.Manoharan v. The Superintendent Of Police

2025-03-28Honourable Mr. Justice P.Dhanabal4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.03.2025 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL R.Manoharan ... Petitioner Vs

1. The Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Puliyangudi, Tenkasi District.

3. The District Collector, Tenkasi District.

4. The Tahsildar, Kadaiyanallur Taluk, Tenkasi District.

5. The Inspector of Police, Puliyangudi Police Station, Tenkasi District.

6. S.Mathavan

7. Maheswaran ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent no. 1 to 3 to provide adequate police protection for the 1/4

petitioner to fence his property in S.No. 265/2B and 265/3, Thalaivankottai Village, Kadaiyanallur Taluk, Tenkasi District compromised in Patta No. 3208 by considering the petitioner representation dated 20.11.2024 within a time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Dinesh For Respondents : Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi (R1,2,5) Government Advocate (Crl.Side) Mr.M.Senthil Ayyanar (R3,4) Government Advocate

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondent no. 1 to 3 to provide adequate police protection for the petitioner to fence his property in S.No. 265/2B and 265/3, Thalaivankottai Village, Kadaiyanallur Taluk, Tenkasi District compromised in Patta No. 3208 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 20.11.2024. 2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the representation of the petitioner was already considered and closed. Nothing survives for further adjudication. 2/4

3.Since the representation of the petitioner was already considered and closed, nothing survives for further adjudication. 4.In view of the same, this writ petition stands closed by preserving the liberty of the petitioner to challenge the closure report in the manner known to law.

28.03.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No PNM To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Puliyangudi, Tenkasi District.

3. The District Collector, Tenkasi District.

4. The Tahsildar, Kadaiyanallur Taluk, Tenkasi District.

5. The Inspector of Police, Puliyangudi Police Station, Tenkasi District.

6.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

P.DHANABAL , J.

PNM ORDER IN 28.03.2025 4/4