← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/21735/2023allowed

Meenal v. The Inspector Of Police

2023-12-04Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:04.12.2023

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN and Crl.M.P.(MD).No.16735 of 2023 1.Meenal 2.Saravanan 3.Ramesh 4.Amutha 5.Arunachalam 6.Mathiyalagan 7.Rameshbabu ... Petitioners Vs.

1.The State rep by The Inspector of Police, DCB Police Station, Pudukkottai, Crime No.14/2023.

2.Sundaram

...Respondents

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned FIR in Crime No. 14 of 2023 on the file of the 1st respondent police and quash the same.

For Petitioners : Mr.K.G.Arunkumar 1/5

For R1 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Addl.Public Prosecutor (Crl.side) For R2 : Mr.C.Ezhilarasan

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking to quash the impugned FIR in Crime No.14 of 2023 on the file of the 1st respondent police. 2.The contention of the petitioners is that based on the complaint lodged by the 2nd respondent, the 1st respondent registered the First Information Report in Crime No.14 of 2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 120B, 465, 466, 471, 417, 419 and 420 of IPC. 3.The further contention of the petitioners is that they compromised the issue with the 2nd respondent amicably. A joint memo of compromise was filed, which has been duly signed by the petitioners and the 2nd respondent and also by their respective counsels. 4.The petitioners and the 2nd respondent appeared before this Court 2/5

along with their counsels and also produced their Aadhar cards. They were also identified by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) and the Investigation Officer. Both the parties were enquired by me and they accepted the terms of compromise. The issue is between the close relatives. The defacto complainant would submit that some of the properties were given to him, that was accepted by him. Hence, the Compromise Memo is recorded.

5.Considering the totality of the circumstances, the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners and also in view of the joint compromise memo, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose will be served by keeping the matter pending and inclined to quash all further proceedings in Crime No.14 of 2023 pending on the file of the 1st respondent police in respect of these petitioners. 6.In the result, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and the entire proceedings in Crime No.14 of 2023, pending on the file of the 1st respondent police is hereby quashed in respect of the petitioners. The compromise memo is recorded and the terms of joint compromise memo 3/5

shall form part of this order. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

04.12.2023 NCC :

Yes / No Index :

Yes / No Internet :

Yes / No TM To 1.The Inspector of Police, DCB Police Station, Pudukkottai, Crime No.14/2023.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

G.ILANGOVAN ,J.

TM 04.12.2023 5/5