← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/27904/2023dismissed

Uma Shankar v. The District Collector

2023-12-21Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam,Honourable Mr Justice V. Lakshminarayanan5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.12.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.24003 & 24004 of 2023 Uma Shankar ... Petitioner -vs1.The District Collector Tenkasi District, Tenkasi 2.The Tahsildar Sankarankovil Taluk Sankarankoil Tenkasi District 3.The Revenue Inspector Karivalamvanthanallur Sankarankoil Taluk Tenkasi District 4.The Village Panchayat President Karivalamvanthanallur Village Panchayat Karivalamvanthanallur Sankarankoil Taluk Tenkasi District

5.Pauldurai ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned notice dated 14.11.2023, passed by the second respondent and quash the same and consequently direction to the respondents 1 to 4 not to interfere with the petitioner's possession and enjoyment in S.No.1411/3, 1411/4 (Old S.No.1021/A1), situated at Karivalamvanthanallur Village, Sankarankovil Taluk, Tenkasi District.

For Petitioner :

Mr.M.Ramu For Respondents :

Mr.S.Kameswaran Government Advocate for R1 to R4 Mr.F.X.Eugene for R5

O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.] The order, dated 14.11.2023, passed by the second respondent, under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (for brevity, "the Act"), is under challenge in this writ petition.

2. The impugned order has been passed pursuant to the orders of this Court dated 16.10.2023, in W.P.(MD) No.24937 of 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner mainly contended that pendency of the civil suit has not been placed before this Court, while the said writ petition was disposed of.

4. Even then, by the order dated 16.10.2023, in W.P.(MD) No. 24937 of 2023, we have not decided the issues on merits. We have directed the authorities concerned to look into the documents and in event of identifying any encroachments, then actions are to be initiated for removal of encroachments. Pursuant to the directions of this Court, actions were initiated. The impugned order passed under Section 6 of the Act is assailable by an appeal before the Appellate Authority under Section 10 of the Act. Therefore, the petitioner is at liberty to prefer an appeal before the appellate authority and raise all the grounds, including the pendency of the suit or otherwise.

5. With the above observation, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. [S.M.S., J.] [V.L.N., J.] 21.12.2023 NCC :

Yes / No Index :

Yes / No Internet :

Yes / No krk To:

1.The District Collector, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi.

2.The Tahsildar, Sankarankovil Taluk, Sankarankoil, Tenkasi District.

3.The Revenue Inspector, Karivalamvanthanallur, Sankarankoil Taluk, Tenkasi District.

4.The Village Panchayat President, Karivalamvanthanallur Village Panchayat, Karivalamvanthanallur, Sankarankoil Taluk, Tenkasi District.

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

and V.

LAKSHMINARAYANAN , J.

krk and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.24003 & 24004 of 21.12.2023