Sakthivel v. The State Of Tamil Nadu,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.02.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Sakthivel ... Appellant versus
1. State rep. By The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sattur Sub-Division, Virudhunagar District.
2. State rep. By The Inspector of Police, Sattur Town Police Station, Virudhunagar District.
3. E.Vijayalakshmi
4. Mageshwari ... Respondents Appeal filed under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, to call for the records relating to the order daed 19.11.2024 passed in Cr.M.P.No.309 of 2024 in Spl.S.C.No.85 of 2024 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for Trial of SC/ST (POA) Act Cases, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputtur and set aside the same and enlarge the appellant on bail in Spl.S.C.No.85 of 2024 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Special 1/4
Court for Trial of SC/ST (POA) Act Cases, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputtur in Crime No.236 of 2024 on the file of the respondent Police. For Appellant : Mr.P.Pratheesh For R1 and R2 : Mr.P.Kottaichamy, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For R3 : No appearance For R4 : Mr.M.Mithun Legal Aid Counsel
JUDGMENT
This Criminal Appeal is filed challenging the order dated 19.11.2024 passed in Cr.M.P.No.309 of 2024 in Spl.S.C.No.85 of 2024 by the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for Trial of SC/ST (POA) Act Cases, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputtur, rejecting the bail petition filed by the appellant.
2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that apart from this case, the appellant is also involved in two murder cases and therefore, considering the antecedent of the appellant, the bail petition filed by the appellant was dismissed by the learned Sessions Judge. He further submits that in the present case, final report was filed and the same was taken on file in Spl.S.C.No.85 of 2024 and now, the case is posted for 2/4
framing of charges.
3. At this juncture, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Appeal. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
4. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, this Criminal Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 24.02.2025 ogy NCC : Yes / No.
Index : Yes / No.
Internet : Yes / No.
To
1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sattur Sub-Division, Virudhunagar District.
2. The Inspector of Police, Sattur Town Police Station, Virudhunagar District.
2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
3/4
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
ogy 24.02.2025 4/4