Madras High CourtWP(MD)/28126/2023dismissed as infructuous

Subramani.P v. The Superintendent Of Police

2023-11-29Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.11.2023 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN W.P(MD) No.28126 of 2023 P.Subramani ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Karur District, Karur.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Karur Division, Karur.

3.The Inspector of Police, Thanthondimalai Police Station, Karur District.

4.Rajavel @ Rajagopal ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents No.1 to 3 not to interfere with the suit properties in the Civil dispute in O.S.No.12 of 2019 on the file of the Additional District Court (Mahila Court), Karur, based on the petitioners complaint dated 10.11.2023 and 22.11.2023, within the period stipulated by this Court. 1/4

For Petitioner :Mr.M.Maria Vinola For Respondents :Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl.side)

O R D E R

This Writ Petition is filed in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents No.1 to 3 not to interfere with the suit properties in the Civil dispute in O.S.No.12 of 2019 on the file of the Additional District Court (Mahila Court), Karur, based on the petitioners complaint dated 10.11.2023 and 22.11.2023, within the period stipulated by this Court.

2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the fourth respondent namely Rajavel @ Rajagopal, enquiry was undertaken. During the course of enquiry, it was found that the fourth respondent was the auction purchaser of the property situated in Survey No.262/4 in Karuppampalayam Vilage, Karur. After that the minor daughter of this petitioner alleged to have filed a suit in O.S.No.20 of 2012 seeking partition. During the course of enquiry, undertaking was given by the fourth respondent herein that he will obtain proper permission from the Court within 25.11.2023, in case 2/4

of failure, he will not make any trouble to the fourth respondent. On the basis of the above said undertaking, the above said enquiry was closed.

3. In view of the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), nothing survives for further consideration or direction in this matter. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

29.11.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet: Yes/ No INDU To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Karur District, Karur.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Karur Division, Karur.

3.The Inspector of Police, Thanthondimalai Police Station, Karur District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

G.ILANGOVAN, J INDU Order made in W.P(MD) No.28126 of 2023 Dated 29.11.2023 4/4