← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/21564/2023allowed

S.Sriram @ Sriramkumar v. The Inspector Of Police

2023-11-30Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.11.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN 1.S.Sriram @ Sriramkumar 2.S.Surendhir @ Surendhiran 3.K.Babu 4.A.Rajesh @ Rajeshkumar 5.R.Vengatesh 6.D.Thamba Mani @ Manikandan ... Petitioners Vs.

1.The Inspector of Police, Pattukottai Police Station, Thanjavur District.

(Crime No.102 of 2017) 2.R.Rajesh ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C,To call for the records pertaining to the Impugned Charge Sheet in PRC No.58/2023 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Pattukottai, Thanjavur District in Crime No.102/2017 u/s.147, 148, 341, 294(b), 307 and 120(b) of IPC.

For Petitioners : Mr.K.Dinesh 1/5

For R1 : Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl.side) For R2 : Mr.K.Sheenivasan O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the impugned charge sheet in P.R.C.No.58 of 2023 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Pattukottai, Thanjavur District. 2.The contention of the petitioners is that based on the complaint lodged by the 2nd respondent, the 1st respondent registered the First Information Report in Crime No.102 of 2017 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 307 and 120(b) of IPC, against the petitioners.

3.The further contention of the petitioners is that they compromised the issue with the 2nd respondent amicably. A joint memo of compromise was filed, which has been duly signed by the petitioners and the 2nd respondent and also by their respective counsels. 4.The petitioners and the 2nd respondent appeared before this Court along with their counsels and also produced their Aadhar cards. They 2/5

were also identified by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) and the Investigation Officer. Both the parties were enquired by me and they accepted the terms of compromise. Hence, the Compromise Memo is recorded.

5.Considering the totality of the circumstances, the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners and also in view of the joint compromise memo, dated 20.11.2023, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose will be served by keeping the matter pending. Hence, all further proceedings in P.R.C.No.58 of 2023 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pattukottai, Thanjavur District, is quashed and the compromise memo is recorded.

6.In the result, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and the entire proceedings in P.R.C.No.58 of 2023, pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pattukottai, Thanjavur District, is hereby quashed in respect of the petitioners and the terms of joint compromise memo shall form part of this order.

30.11.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No cp 3/5

To 1.The Inspector of Police, Pattukottai Police Station, Thanjavur District.

(Crime No.102 of 2017) 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

G.ILANGOVAN. J.

cp 30.11.2023 5/5