← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/16227/2025granted

Ganesh v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep. By

2025-09-25Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 25.09.2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD)No.16227 of 2025 Ganesh ... Petitioner/ Accused No.1 Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Woraiyur Police Station, Trichy City.

(Crime No.65 of 2020) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramakrishnan For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.65 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police in pursuant of the NBW issued against the petitioner in C.C.No.16 of 2023 on the file of learned Additional District Judge for E.C and NDPS Act, Cases, Pudukottai.

1/6

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 23.07.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c) & 20(b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985, in Crime No.65 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was in illegal possession of 1.14 kilograms of Ganja. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 23.07.2025. Hence, he seeks bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that a Non-bailable Warrant was issued on 22.07.2025 and that the trial is 2/6

almost on the verge of completion. He further submitted that there are three previous cases pending against the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration the fact that even though three previous cases are pending against the petitioner, the trial is almost on the verge of completion, the present case does not involve commercial quantity and also considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District Judge for E.C and NDPS Act Cases, Pudukkottai, and on further conditions that :- [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity. 3/6

[b] the petitioner shall report before the Trial Court daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. He has to co-operate for the investigation.

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

(S S Y J) 25.09.2025 jbr 4/6

To

1. The Additional District Judge for E.C and NDPS Act Cases, Pudukkottai.

2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Thiruchirappalli.

3. The Inspector of Police, Woraiyur Police Station, Trichy City.

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

S.SRIMATHY,J.

jbr

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.16227 of 2025 Date : 25.09.2025 6/6