← Library
Madras High CourtREV.APLC(MD)/218/2025closed

A.Ramalingam v. The Government Of Tamilnadu

2025-11-05Honourable Mr Justice C.V. Karthikeyan,Honourable Mr Justice R.Vijayakumar5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.11.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Rev. Aplc.(MD) No.218 of 2025 A.Ramalingam ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu represented by the Secretary Higher Education Department Chennai - 9

2. The Director of Collegiate Education, DPI Compound, Chennai 6

3. The Join Director of Collegiate Education, DPI compound Chennai 6 4.The Principal Mannar Doraisingam Government Arts College, Sivagangai 5.The Bursar Mannar Doraisingam Government Arts College, Sivagangai ... Respondents

PRAYER: Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 and 2 of the code of Civil Procedure to review the judgment dated 23.09.2024 in WA(MD) No.1145 of 2018.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Ramalingam Petitioner in person For Respondents : Mr.T.Amjad Khan Government Advocate

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.) The Review Application has been filed seeking to review the judgment in WA(MD) No.1145/2018 dated 23.09.2024.

2. It is the contention of the petitioner, who appeared as party in person, that in paragraph 5, this Court had stated as follows: "5....It is contended on behalf of the writ petitioner that the amount of Rs.1,00,000/- had come into force on and from 01.04.2010 for the financial year 2010-2011." It is stated that the financial year should be given as 2009-10.

3. Heard the learned Government Advocate also.

4. Taking into consideration the fact, which according to the petitioner, who appeared as party-in-person, is an error, the financial year alone is changed from 2010-2011 to 2009-2010. The correct version is as follows::

"5....It is contended on behalf of the writ petitioner that the amount of Rs.1,00,000/- had come into force on and from 01.04.2010 for the financial year 2009-2010."

In all other respects, we are not inclined to review the order already passed.

5. To this limited extent, the Review Application stands allowed. No costs.

[C.V.K., J.] [R.V., J.] 05.11.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No RR

To:

1.The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 9..

2. The District Magistrate And District Collector,, Office of the District Magistrate and District Collector Dindigul District, Dindigul.

3. The Superintendent of Prison,, Madurai Central Prison, Madurai.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

C.V. KARTHIKEYAN , J.

AND R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

RR 05.11.2025