Gnanambal Appavu v. The Regional Passport Officer

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.12.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI GnanambalAppavu ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Passport Officer , Regional Passport Office, New Municipal Complex, 7th Cross, Thillai Nagar, Tiruchirappalli - 620 018.

2.The Inspector of Police, Pattukottai All Women's Police Station, Thanjavur District.

... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent no.1 to issue the Passport to the petitioner considering the application in File No.TR1076985688924 dated 01.10.2024 within the time stipulated by this Court.

1/6

For Petitioner : Mr.K.M.Karunakaran For Respondents : Mr.B.Narayan Ram (R1) Central Government Standing Counsel Mr.N.Gnanasekaran (R2) Government Advocate

ORDER

Mr.B.Narayan Ram, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the first respondent. Mr.N.Gnanasekaran, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the second respondent. By consent of both parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

2. The prayer in the Writ Petition reads as follows:- "To issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent no.1 to issue the passport to the petitioner by considering the application in File No.TR1076985688924 dated 01.10.2024 within the time stipulated by this Court."

3. Heard the learned counsel on both sides and carefully perused the entire materials available on record.

2/6

4. The petitioner applied for issuance of passport vide his application in TR1076985688924 on 01.10.2024. On receipt of the same, the first respondent issued a letter dated 06.11.2024 directing him to appear before the authority seeking explanation about the case registered against him in Crime No.23 of 2022 on the file of the 2nd respondent police. Hence, the petitioner filed this writ petition seeking for the aforesaid relief.

5. It is a settled proposition of law that a mere pendency of FIR cannot be a bar for consideration of claim for issuance of passport. This Court in the case of W.Jaihar William Vs State of Tamil Nadu reported in 2014 (2) CWC 684 has held that mere pendency of FIR cannot be construed as pendency of criminal proceedings, unless Judicial Magistrate takes cognizance of offence, on filing of charge sheet on completion of investigation against the accused. Right to travel abroad is a fundamental right.

6. In view of the same, the first respondent is hereby directed to consider the application of the petitioner to issue his passport without reference to the FIRs lodged against him, if he is otherwise eligible for the same. The first respondent shall comply with the said direction on merits and in accordance 3/6

with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7. With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands allowed. There shall be no order as to costs.

18.12.2024 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Sm 4/6

TO:- 1.The Passport Officer , Regional Passport Office, New Municipal Complex, 7th Cross, Thillai Nagar, Tiruchirappalli - 620 018.

2.The Inspector of Police, Pattukottai All Women's Police Station, Thanjavur District.

5/6

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

Sm Order made in Dated 18.12.2024 6/6