Kasi Mayan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.12.2023

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN and Crl.M.P.(MD).No.17118 & 17120 of 2023 1.Kasi Mayan 2.Sasi Veeranan 3.Selvi @ Jeyalakshmi 4.Pasupathi 5.Alagar @ Alagarsamy ... Petitioners/Accused No.1,4to7 Vs.

1.State rep by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Nilakottai Police Station, Dindigul District.

(Crime No.4/2014).

... Respondent/Complainant 2.Muthu Bharathy

...Respondent/Defacto Complainant

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, To call for the records in pursuant to C.C.No.226 of 2014 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Nilakottai, and quash the same.

1/5

For Petitioners : Mr.M.Karthikeya Venkitachalapathy For R1 : Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl.side) For R2 : Mr.R.SureshKumar

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition is filed seeking quashment of in impugned charge sheet in C.C.No.226 of 2014 on the file of the learned learned Judicial Magistrate Nilakottai, in connection with Crime No.4 of 2014 on the file of the 1st Respondent Police. 2.The contention of the petitioners is that based on the complaint lodged by the 2nd respondent, the 1st respondent registered the First Information Report in Crime No.4 of 2014 for the offences punishable under Sections498(A), 406 & 506(i) of IPC, against the petitioners. 3.The further contention of the petitioners is that they compromised the issue with the 2nd respondent amicably. A joint memo of compromise was filed, which has been duly signed by the petitioners and the 2nd respondent and also by their respective counsels. 2/5

4.The petitioners and the 2nd respondent appeared before this Court along with their counsels and also produced their Aadhar cards. They were also identified by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and the Investigation Officer. Both the parties were enquired by me and they accepted the terms of compromise. It is a matrimonial Issue. Now the husband and wife are living together. Hence, the Compromise Memo is recorded.

5.Considering the totality of the circumstances, the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners and also in view of the joint compromise memo, dated 20.12.2023, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose will be served by keeping the matter pending. Hence, all further proceedings in C.C.No.226 of 2014 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakoottai, is quashed and the compromise memo is recorded.

6.In the result, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and the entire proceedings in C.C.No.226 of 2014 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakoottai, is hereby quashed in respect of 3/5

the petitioners and the terms of joint compromise memo shall form part of this order. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

20.12.2023 NCC :

Yes / No Index :

Yes / No Internet :

Yes / No dss To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Nilakoottai.

2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Nilakottai Police Station, Dindigul District.

(Crime No.4/2014).

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

G.ILANGOVAN ,J.

dss and Crl.M.P.(MD).No.17118 & 17120 of 2023 20.12.2023 5/5