Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/23240/2013granted

Rasool Beevi v. The Inspector Of Police

2013-12-20Honourable Mr Justice M. Sathyanarayanan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twentieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.SATHYANARAYANAN CRL OP(MD) No.23240 of 2013 1 RASOOL BEEVI 2 ABDUL RASEED ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AWPS, THIRUVADANAI, RAMNAD DISTRICT CR.NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2013 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.M.R.JEGADEESWARAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.V.Rajarajan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged commission of offences punishable under Section 498(A) IPC and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and they have nothing to do with the alleged commission of offences.

3. Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that based on the complaint received from the de-facto complainant, enquiry is being conducted.

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the State and also perused the materials available on record.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram and on their executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police, as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 20/12/2013 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.I, RAMANTHAPURAM. 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AWPS, THIRUVADANAI, RAMNAD DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.M.R.JEGADEESWARAN Advocate SR.No.64110. TS/26.12.2013/2P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.23240 of 2013 Date :20/12/2013 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/