← Library
Madras High CourtHCP(MD)/1184/2025closed

Thirumavalavan v. The State Of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By The Superintendent Of Police,

2025-09-25Honourable Mr Justice C.V. Karthikeyan,Honourable Mr Justice R.Vijayakumar5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.09.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Thirumavalavan ... Petitioner -vs1. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Superintendent of Police, Trichy,

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Musiri, 3.The Inspector of Police, Musiri Police Station, 4.Gowtham ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to find and produce the body or person of the detenue namely, Narmadha [Petitioner's daughter], aged about 25 years, D/o.Thirumavalavan, before this Court and hand over to the petitioner's custody.

For Petitioner :

Mr.A.Joel Paul Antony For R1 to R3 :

Mr.A.Thiruvadi Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.) The Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed seeking the production of the petitioner's daughter. The daughter is approximately 25 years old. It is contended that she was studying in the final year of M.Sc. at Jamal Mohamed College, Trichy, and has been missing since 23.08.2025.

2. When the matter came up for hearing, it was informed that the detenue had been produced. It was further informed that she had entered into a relationship with the fourth respondent. The petitioner had also arrived from Musiri, Trichy District, along with his wife, who is the mother of the detenue. We permitted them to have a discussion among themselves. We also examined the detenue, her parents, and the fourth respondent. The detenue expressed a firm opinion that she wished to reside only with the fourth respondent. She also stated that she intends to complete her M.Sc. Computer Science course.

3. We conveyed this decision to the parents, who were advised to reconcile with it. We also had a discussion with the fourth respondent, who assured us that he would take care of the detenue and would not prevent her from completing her studies. The detenue stated that she would arrange to stay in a hostel in Trichy to complete her studies.

4. In view of the firm decision taken by the detenue in this regard, and considering that she is not under unlawful or illegal custody, we are inclined to close the Habeas Corpus Petition. Accordingly, this Habeas Corpus Petition is closed.

[C.V.K., J.] [R.V., J.] 25.09.2025 smn2 To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Trichy,

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Musiri,

3.The Inspector of Police, Musiri Police Station,

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN , J.

and R.VIJAYAKUMAR , J.

smn2 25.09.2025