Madras High CourtWP Crl.(MD)/1573/2025dismissed as infructuous

V.Maharajan v. The Superintendent Of Police,

2025-10-16Honourable Mr Justice Sunder Mohan4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.10.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN W.P.Crl.(MD).Nos.1573 and 1704 of 2025 W.P.Crl.(MD).No.1573 of 2025 V.Maharajan ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Srivaikundam, Thoothukudi District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Murappanadu Police Station, Srivaikundam Taluk, Thoothukudi District.

... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a writ of certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned rejection order dated 19.09.2025 passed by the 3rd respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to grant permission to the petitioner for conducting protest meeting near the Vallandu Bus Stand, Tuticorin district on 28.09.2025 at about 5.00 p.m., by considering the petitioner's representation dated 12.09.2025. 1/4

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sathyachidambaram For Respondents : Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram Additional Public Prosecutor W.P.Crl.(MD).No.1704 of 2025 V.Maharajan ... Petitioner Vs.

The Inspector of Police, Valliyur Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to grant police permission for conducting protest near Valliyur Kamarajar Statue, Thirunelveli District, on 12.10.2025 at about 05.00 PM to 07.00 PM by considering my representation dated 29.09.2025 within the stipulated time by this court.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sathyachidambaram For Respondent : Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram Additional Public Prosecutor COMMON ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the prayers sought for in the writ petitions have become infructuous and the petitioner may be granted liberty to file a fresh representation. 2/4

2. In view of the above said submission, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to send a fresh representation, which may be considered by the respondent in accordance to the law. 16.10.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No cp To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Srivaikundam, Thoothukudi District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Murappanadu Police Station, Srivaikundam Taluk, Thoothukudi District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

cp W.P.Crl.(MD).Nos.1573 and 1704 of 2025 16.10.2025 4/4