← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/22100/2023dismissed

Ramesh v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2024-11-29Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.11.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Crl.O.P.(MD) No.22100 of 2023 and Crl.M.P.(MD) No.17297 of 2023 1.Ramesh 2.Rajesh ... Petitioners Vs.

1.The sub-Inspector of Police, Thuckalay Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

Crime No.343 of 2019 2.Kanagaraj ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the impugned order dated 31.10.2023 passed in Crl.M.P.No.7528 of 2023 on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.1, Padmanabhapuram, pending disposal of the main criminal original petition.

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Murugan For Respondents : Mr.A.Albert James Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for R1 1/5

O R D E R

This petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the Court below condoning the delay in filing the police report in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 473 of Cr.P.C. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the first respondent.

3.The FIR was registered for offences under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of IPC on 27.06.2019. On completion of investigation, there was a delay in filing the police report. The delay was attributed towards two reasons. The first reason is that there was a change in investigation officer and therefore, there was a delay in completing the investigation. The second reason that has been assigned is that there was an intervening pandemic period. 2/5

4.The Court below has properly applied its mind and come to the conclusion that there are justifiable grounds to condone the delay. While taking this decision, notice was issued to the petitioner and only after hearing the petitioners, the order was passed. The order does not suffer from any illegality warranting the interference of this Court. 5.If according to the petitioners, no offence has been made out in the final report, it is left open to the petitioners to independently challenge the same in the manner know to law. This order will not stand in the way of the petitioners.

6.In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 29.11.2024 NCC :

Yes / No Index :

Yes / No Internet :

Yes / No PKN 3/5

To 1.The sub-Inspector of Police, Thuckalay Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court.

4/5

N.ANAND VENKATESH,J.

PKN Dated: 29.11.2024 5/5