Gowshick v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23677 of 2013 1 GOWSHICK 2 GOWTHAM 3 ILAYARAJA 4 SATHISHKUMAR 5 PANDIAMMAL 6 M. MALATHI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NOS.1,2,3,4,7 & 9 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MELUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.612 OF 2013 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.AK.AZAGARSAMI Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 4, 7 and 9 apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged commission of offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 323, 324 & 506(ii) of IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Women Harassment Act, in Crime No.612 of 2013 on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the first petitioner/A1 had fallen love with the daughter of the defacto complainant and subsequently, he refused to marry her. Consequently, all the accused attacked the de-facto complainant's party, resulting in registration of this case against the accused. 3.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit that this is a case of no injury.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that no injury has been caused by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously.

6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 30/12/2013 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MELUR.

2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MELUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.AK.AZAGARSAMI Advocate SR.No.30

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.23677 of 2013 Date :30/12/2013 msm 02.01.2014 p2/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/