Chitradevi v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.03.2024 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP Crl.O.P.(MD)Nos.774 of 2024 & 23241 of 2023 Crl.O.P.(MD)No.774 of 2024 1.Chitradevi

2. Thangam

3. Chella Pandi ... Petitioners Vs.

1. State represented by The Inspector of Police, (In Crime No.1060 of 2022)

2. Mookambigai ... Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to call for the records relating to the impugned charge sheet in C.C.No.802 of 2023 on the file of the Additional Mahila Court, Judicial Magistrate (Magisterial Level), Madurai and quash the same. 1/5

For Petitioners : M/S.P.Umamaheswari For R-1 : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh Government Advocate (Crl. side) For R-2 : Mr.K.Sivabalan Crl.O.P.(MD)No.23241 of 2023 1.Sivakumar

2. Moogambigai

3. Amutha

4. Rohini ... Petitioners Vs.

1. State represented by The Inspector of Police, (In Crime No.1061 of 2022)

2. Chitradevi ... Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to call for the records relating to the impugned charge sheet in C.C.No.104 of 2023 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court (Magisterial Level), Madurai and quash the same.

For Petitioners : Mr.K.Sivabalan For R-1 : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh Government Advocate (Crl. side) For R-2 : M/S.P.Umamaheswari 2/5

COMMON ORDER The learned Counsel for the Petitioners submitted that the Petitioners had filed the petition in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.774 of 2024, seeking to quash the charge-sheet filed in C.C.No.802 of 2023 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court (Magisterial Level), Madurai and the petition in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.23241 of 2023, seeking to quash the chargesheet filed in C.C.No.104 of 2023 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court (Magisterial Level), Madurai 2.The learned Counsel for the Petitioners and the learned Counsel for the de-facto Complainant had filed Joint Compromise Memo stating that the accused and the de-facto Complainant had arrived at a compromise. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) on instructions of the Respondent Police would submit that the compromise arrived at between the parties are bonafide.

4.In the light of the joint memo, filed by both the parties through their respective Counsels, the case in C.C.No.802 of 2023 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court (Magisterial Level), Madurai and the case in C.C.No.104 of 2023 on the file of the learned 3/5

Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court (Magisterial Level), Madurai, are hereby quashed.

5.In view of the above, both the Criminal Original Petitions are allowed.

06.03.2024 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No jbr To 1.The Inspector of Police, 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J., jbr Crl.O.P.(MD)Nos.774 of 2024 & 23241 of 2023 06.03.2024 5/5