Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/7938/2011disposed of

Mahesh @ Maheshwaran v. The Inspector Of Police

2017-11-01Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.11.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Crl.O.P.(MD)No.7938 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.2 and 3 of 2011 1.Mahesh @ Maheswaran 2.Manickam 3.Rajeswari 4.Bhuvaneswari 5.Gnanaprakasam ... Petitioners/Accused 1 to 5 Vs.

1.State Represented by, The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Sri Rengam Taluk, Trichy District.

... Respondent/Complainant

2. Arin Mariya @ Mariya ... 2nd Respondent/De-facto Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records in C.C.No.41 of 2011, pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Trichy and quash the same and allow the Criminal Original Petition.

For Petitioners : Mr.Madhava Govindan for M/s.K.Kumaravel For R1 : Mr.K.Anbarasan Government Advocate (Crl.side) For R2 : Mr.G.Ramanathan

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash C.C.No.41 of 2011, pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.IV, Trichy.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that at the instigation of the elders of their family, the matter was settled amicably between the petitioners and the second respondent, out of Court. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the second respondent and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for

the first respondent, who have also conceded the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. The learned counsel for the second respondent submitted that the second respondent has filed a counter affidavit to that effect.

4. In view of the above said submission made by the learned counsel on both side and also in view of the counter affidavit filed by the second respondent, which was duly signed by herself and her counsel, stating that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties out of Court, nothing survives in this petition for further adjudication.

5. In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is closed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. The counter affidavit filed by the second respondent shall form part of the order.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(RTI) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Trichy District.

2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Sri Rengam Taluk, Trichy District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+One cc to Mr.G.Ramanathan, Advocate, SR.No.84861 +2 ccs to M/s.K.Kumaravel, Advocate, SR.No.84862 PJL RL/7C/2P/KP/SAR1/16/11/2017 Crl.O.P.(MD)No.7938 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 01.11.2017