Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/4728/2013disposed of

Chandrasekaran, v. The Inspector Of Police,

2018-02-02Honourable Mr Justice R. Pongiappan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.02.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4728 of 2013 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2013 1.Chandrasekaran 2.Balasubramanian 3.Jayapaulan ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 3 Vs.

1. The State rep by The Inspector of Police, Puliyangudi Police Station, Puliyangudi, Tirunelveli District.

(Crime No.22 of 2005) ... Respondent/Complainant 2.Arumuga Nadar 3.Selvam ... Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER: The Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to call for the records in C.C.No.505 of 2010 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Palanivelayutham For R1 : Mr.A.Robinson Government Advocate(Crl.side) For R2 : Mr.Rathinavel Pandian For R3 : No Appearance

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for the records in C.C.No.505 of 2010 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2.Though the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners

raised several grounds for quashing the proceedings in C.C.No.505 of 2010, he submitted that it would suffice, if a direction is issued to the Trial Court to complete the trial within a time limit that may be stipulated by this Court and also to permit the petitioners to raise all the grounds raised in this petition before the Trial Court. However, he requested the appearance of the petitioners may be dispensed with before the Trial Court. 3.I have heard the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the first respondent, who has also conceded the request of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. 4.In the light of the above said submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, directs the learned Judicial Magistrate No.

I, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District to dispose the case in C.C.No. 505 of 2010 within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Meanwhile, the appearance of the third petitioner is dispensed with unless the learned Judicial Magistrate feels that his presence is required for the disposal of the case.

5.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AD-II) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Puliyangudi Police Station, Puliyangudi, Tirunelveli District.

(Crime No.22 of 2005).

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+ 1 cc TO Mr.J.C.Rathnavel pandian , Advocate in SR No. 46024 gns AE/MR/SAR2/15.02.2018/2P/5C Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4728 of 2013 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2013 02.02.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/