Janani v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fourth day of January Two Thousand and Twenty Four PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI JANANI ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.1 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH (DCB) TIRUNELVELI,.

TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.16/2023.

... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/s.T.INDRACHITHU Advocate For Respondent : Mr.P.KOTTAICHAMY, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. PRAYER:

FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN CRIME NO.16/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE RESPONDENT POLICE.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 417, 420, 465, 468, 471 and 120(B) IPC in Cr.No.16 of 2023, seeks anticipatory bail.

1/3

2. The case of the prosecution is that the accused persons on the premise that they would obtain a job to the de-facto complainant in Canada, demanded and received a sum of Rs.12,00,000/- from the de-facto complainant and paid only a sum of Rs.10,50,000/- on various dates. When the de-facto complainant demanded the remaining amount, A2 and A3 prolonging the issue and they refused to give the original passport and visa to the de-facto complainant. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and she has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate would submit that this is the second anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioner and this Court has already dismissed the earlier anticipatory bail application of the petitioner. The accused neither returned back the money nor the passport and visa of the de-facto complainant. Hence, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5.Considering the gravity of offence and the earlier anticipatory bail petition was dismissed by this Court and there is no change of circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2/3

6.Accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed. sd/- 04/01/2024 / TRUE COPY / /01/2024 Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

RR TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH (DCB) TIRUNELVELI,.

TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN Date :04/01/2024 SS/JGB/SAR- /12/01/2024/3P/3C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 3/3