← Library
Madras High CourtWMP(MD)/25657/2023dismissed

The Secretary To Government v. S.Srikanda Raja

2024-03-04Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Date : 31.01.2024

CORAM

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M. DHANDAPANI in Rev. Apl.W (MD) SR 91466 of 2023 1.The Secretary to Government Animal Husbandry Dairying and Fisheries Department, Secretariat, Chennai 9 2.The Director of Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Services, O/o.The Director of Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Services, Central Office Buildings Block II Chennai 6 ... Respondents/ Review Petitioners Vs 1.Srikanda Raja ... respondent/writ petitioner 2.M.Gowrisankar 3.S.Murugan 4.J.Kanjana 5.P.Ramkumar 6.S.Satish 7.A.Arun 8.R.Bindhu 1/4

9.R.Amutha 10.S.Jamunarani 11.K.Jothilakshmi .. Respondents/ respondents PRAYER in WMP (MD) No.25657/2023:- Petition is filed under Section 5 of the Limittion Act to condone the delay of 301 days in filing the above review petition against the order dated 11.01.2023 made in WP.(MD) No.11524 of 2020.

Prayer in Rev. Apl.W(MD) No.SR91466/2023: Review Application is filed under Order 47 Rule 1 & 2 r/w Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure to review the order dated 11.01.2023 in WP(MD) No.11524 of 2020.

For Petitioners :

Mr.Senthil Ayyanar For respondents: No appearance

ORDER

This application is filed to condone the delay of 301 days in preferring the review application to review the order passed in W.P.(MD) No.11524 /2020 dated 11.01.2023.

2/4

2. Heard the learned Government Advocate for the petitioners/review petitioners and perused the materials available on record.

3. It is to be seen that for condoning the delay of 301 days in filing the review application, no reasonable grounds have been raised. In review proceedings, this Court could review an order only when there is an error apparent on the face of the record. In the present case on hand, there is no error apparent on the face of record. At this juncture, the learned counsel prays this Court for liberty to file an appeal against the order of this court.

4. In view of the above, the application to condone the delay is dismissed. Consequently, the review application stands rejected at the SR stage itself.

04.03.2024 RR 3/4

M.DHANDAPANI. J RR

ORDER

IN in Rev. Apl.W (MD) SR 91466 of 2023 Date : 04.03.2024 4/4