Veerabagu @ Balamurugan v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 08/04/2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Veerabagu @ Balamurugan ... Petitioner/Accused No.10 Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Rep By, The Inspector of Police, NIB CID Madurai Police Station, Madurai District.

Cr.No.11 of 2024. ... Respondent/Respondent PRAYER :- To enlarge the petitioner on bail in C.C.No.30 of 2025 on the file of the Principal Special Court for Trial of NDPS Act Cases, Madurai and thus render justice.

For Petitioner : P.Rengaraju, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.B.Nambi Selvan, Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

The petitioner / A10, who was arrested and remanded to judicial 1/5

custody on 25.11.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(c), 29(1) and 25 of NDPS Act, 1985, in Crime No.11 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 01.08.2024 at about 10.30 am, on the secret information about the transportation of ganja from Andhrapradesh to Tiruchendur on the lorry and from there to Srilanka, the respondent police went to near Meenakshi Bhavan Hotel at Chinna Odaippu, Perungudi, and intercepted the a lorry bearing Reg.No.TN-52B-4416 and a car bearing Reg.No.TN-42-AH-7267 On searching, the accused were found in illegal possession of 120 kg of ganja. Hence the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that only based on the confession made by the coaccused, the petitioner was implicated in this case and the petitioner has been arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 25.11.2024. 2/5

Therefore, prayed to grant bail for the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent strongly opposed to grant bail to the petitioner on the ground that the quantity involved in this case is a commercial quantity and the petitioner is having 2 previous cases similar in nature.

5. This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, nature of offence, and the quantity involved in this case is a commercial quantity and the petitioner is having 2 previous cases similar in nature and considering the gravity of the offence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, at this stage.

7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 3/5

07.04.2026 dss To 1.The Inspector of Police, NIB CID Madurai Police Station, Madurai District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

P. DHANABAL,J DSS

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17062 of 2025 Date : 08/04/2026 5/5