← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/28070/2025disposed of

A.Duraipandian, v. The Tahsildar,

2025-10-13Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :13.10.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY A.Duraipandian ... Petitioner Vs

1. The Tahsildar, Aruppukottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

2. The Head Surveyor, Aruppukottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

3. The Firka Surveyor, Paralachi Hamlet, Chettykulam Group, Aruppukottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

4. The Inspector of Police, Paralachi Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to survey, demarcate and determine the four boundary of petitioner's son's land and petitioner's land measuring to the extent of 40 cents in Survey No.41/1A and 7 cents in Survey No.41/1B in patta Nos. 3915 and 3909 situated at K.Chettykulam Village, Aruppukottai Taluk, 1/5

Virudhunagar District, based on petitioner's application No. 2025/0123/26/007179 dated 07.04.25 and consequently, direct the fourth respondent police to give a police protection at the time of survey above mentioned property within a specific period as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr. S.Balaji For Respondents : Mr.K.R.Badurus Zaman Government Advocate for R1 to R3 Mr.S.Prakash Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R4

O R D E R

By relying on a sale deed dated 04.12.1984, a judgment and decree dated 07.07.1992 in O.S.No.303 of 1985 and patta Nos.3915 and 3909, the petitioner applied online for the conduct of a survey in respect of land in survey Nos.41/1 and 41/1B. The present Writ Petition relates thereto.

2. Learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 to 3 and learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) accepts notice on behalf of the fourth respondent. On written instructions, learned Government Advocate submits that objections have been raised by the owners of adjacent lands.

2/5

3. The petitioner has placed on record both title and revenue records relating to the relevant properties. Therefore, a case is made out to consider the petitioner's request. Before taking a decision in the matter, in view of objections raised by adjacent landowners, it is necessary to issue notice to the adjacent landowners and consider their objections, if any.

4. Subject to the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the respondents 1 to 3 to initiate action on the petitioner's application for a survey and take all necessary measures in relation thereto within three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after issuing notice to the relevant adjoining landowners and the joint pattadars. If necessary, the revenue officials may take the assistance of jurisdictional police. No costs.

NCS : Yes/No 13.10.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No apd 3/5

To

1. The Tahsildar, Aruppukottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

2. The Head Surveyor, Aruppukottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

3. The Firka Surveyor, Paralachi Hamlet, Chettykulam Group, Aruppukottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

4. The Inspector of Police, Paralachi Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

4/5

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY.,J.

apd ORDER MADE IN 13.10.2025 5/5