← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/17874/2025allowed

Sakthivel @ Sakthivel Chinnapillai v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Pandhanallur

2025-10-29Honourable Mr Justice Sunder Mohan4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 29.10.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Crl.O.P.(MD). No.17874 of 2025

1. Sakthivel @ Sakthivel Chinna,

2. Vishnu @ Vishnuraj G.

3. Sakthi @ Sakthivel Ravi

4. Rajesh Rajeshvar Rajeshmohan

5. Sathiyasheelan @ Sathiyaseel ... Petitioners Vs.

1. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Pandhanallur Police Station, Thanjavur District.

(Crime No. 175 of 2021).

2. Anbarasan

3. Kalaivani @ Kalaivani Sankar, ... Respondents PRAYER :-Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to call for the records in Crime No. 175 of 2021 on the file of the 1st respondent police dated 03.05.2021 and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.A.Arun Ramnath, For Respondents : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 : Mr.K.Sasiprabhu for R2 & R3 1/4

ORDER

The petitioners sought for quashing of the FIR in Crime No. 175 of 2021 on the file of the first respondent for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 448, 352, 427 and 506(ii) I.P.C.

2. The gist of the allegation in the impugned F.I.R is that on account of prior enmity, the petitioners had attacked the defacto complainant and others with sticks and caused damages to the property, abused them in filthy language and thus committed the aforesaid offence.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents 2 and 3 would submit that the parties have now entered into a compromise and decided to give a quietus to the entire dispute. The parties have filed a joint compromise memo dated 17.10.2025.

4. The petitioners and the defacto complainant / second respondent and the victims, viz., respondents 3 and 4, are present before this Court in person. They are identified by Mr.C.Kulanthaivelu, Sub Inspector of 2/4

Police, Panthanallur Police Station, Thanjavur District. All the parties confirmed the compromise arrived at between them.

5. Considering the nature of the offences and the compromise between the parties, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned FIR pending investigation. Accordingly, the impugned FIR in Crime No. 175 of 2021, is quashed and the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. The joint compromise memo dated 17.10.2025 shall form part and parcel of the order. 29.10.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No LS TO

1. The Inspector of Police, Pandhanallur Police Station, Thanjavur District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

SUNDER MOHAN,J 3/4

LS CRL OP(MD) No.17874 of 2025 29.10.2025 4/4