← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/22956/2023granted

Antony Raj v. The Inspector Of Police

2024-01-04Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fourth day of January Two Thousand and Twenty Four PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI ANTONY RAJ ... PETITIONER/ ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MELAPALAYAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI CITY, CRIME NO.286/2022.

... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.GEETHA C Advocate For Respondent : MR.SS.MADHAVAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. PRAYER:

FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN CRIME NO.286/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE RESPONDENT POLICE.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for 1/5

the alleged offence under Section 379 IPC in Crime No.286 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 19.07.2023, the petitioner is said to have broken the Hundial of Arulmigu Thalavi Madan Temple and stolen a sum of Rs.5,000/-. Hence this complaint.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that this is the second anticipatory bail application and the earlier application filed by the petitioner in Crl.O.P(MD).No.7263 of 2023 was dismissed on 20.04.2023 on the ground that the petitioner is having three previous cases which are similar in nature.

5. Admittedly, the earlier application filed by the petitioner was dismissed on 20.04.2023 on the ground that the petitioner is having three previous cases. Even after the dismissal of the anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioner, the respondent Police have not taken any steps to secure the accused. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

2/5

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail and he is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Tirunelveli, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

(a)if the petitioner failed to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

(b)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(c)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation; (d)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

3/5

(e)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; (f)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (g)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC;

sd/- 04/01/2024 / TRUE COPY / /01/2024 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.I /II /III /IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

SSB TO THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.V TIRUNELVELI DO THROUGH:

THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, 4/5

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MELAPALAYAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI CITY, THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.C.GEETHA, Advocate ( SR-177[I] dated 04/01/2024 )

ORDER

IN Date :04/01/2024 PKP/DD/SAR- /10.01.2024/ 5P/ 6C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 5/5