← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/29099/2025disposed of

P.Lakshmi v. The District Collector

2025-11-27Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.11.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P(MD)No.29099 of 2025 and W.M.P(MD)No.22560 of 2025 P.Lakshmi ... Petitioner Vs

1. The District Collector, Pudukkottai District Pudkkottai.

2. The District Revenue Officer, Pudukkottai District Pudkkottai.

3. The Tahsildar, Alangudi Taluk, Alangudi, Pudukkottai District.

4. The Executive Officer, Alangudi Town Panchayat, Alangudi, Pudukkottai District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the Impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent in Na.Ka.No.AY/01/2025, dated 22.09.2025 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents to issue Patta to the petitioner in respect of 1/4

land about an extent of 0.020 Ares equalling 5 Cents comprised in Survey Nos. 46/96 and 46/97, Alangudi Village, Alangudi Taluk, Pudukkottai District on the basis of the proceedings in Na.Ka.No.E2, 47761/2000, dated 20.12.2000 and for other reliefs.

For Petitioner : M/s.J.Lawrance For Respondents : Mr.P.Thambidurai Government Advocate for R1 to R3 Mr.N.Ramesh Arumugam Government Advocate for R4

ORDER

An order dated 22.09.2025 rejecting the petitioner's request for patta in respect of 1 are each in S.Nos.46/96 and 46/97 is under challenge in this writ petition.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order was issued on the erroneous basis that the petitioner had applied for a free house site patta. After clarifying that the petitioner did not own any property at the time of making the application, learned counsel submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay the amount fixed by the Government in this regard. 2/4

3. Learned Government Advocate submits that the Tahsildar would reconsider the matter in view of the offer of the petitioner to pay the cost determined by the Government. Learned counsel for the petitioner also files documents indicating that the properties have been subdivided and classified as natham. He also points out that the relevant S.Nos.46/96 and 46/97 also fall within lands classified as natham.

4. Considering the above submissions, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Tahsildar to reconsider the petitioner's request for grant of patta in respect of S.Nos.46/96 and 46/97 on payment of consideration fixed by the Government in this regard. Such request shall be considered after taking note of proceedings dated 20.12.2000 of the District Collector. The order impugned herein will not stand in the way of the consideration of the petitioner's request. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. 27.11.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No RJR 3/4

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.

RJR To

1. The District Collector, Pudukkottai District Pudkkottai.

2. The District Revenue Officer, Pudukkottai District Pudkkottai.

3. The Tahsildar, Alangudi Taluk, Alangudi, Pudukkottai District.

4. The Executive Officer, Alangudi Town Panchayat, Alangudi, Pudukkottai District.

W.P(MD)No.29099 of 2025 27.11.2025 4/4