Perumal v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep.By

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 13/10/2025 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY

1. Perumal

2. Ramkumar

3. Siva Alias Sivaperumal ... Petitioners/Accused Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep.By, The Inspector of Police, Shanarpatti Police Station, Dindigul District.

(Crime No.350 of 2025). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : M/s.B.Prasanna Vinoth, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.S.S. Manoj Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.350 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police ORDER : The Court made the following order :- 1/6

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 132, 351(3) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No.350 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to the dispute regarding the payment of Thalakattur vari to the temple, the petitioners herein are said to have criminally intimidated the defacto complainant and also abused him in filthy language. Hence, the complaint.

3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that no one has sustained injury in the said occurrence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to certain conditions.

2/6

5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Dindigul District, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on further conditions that:

[a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

[c]the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. 3/6

[d]the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners are released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

(S S Y J) 13.10.2025 TRP TO 4/6

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.III, Dindigul District,

2. Do-Through The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindugal District.

3. The State of Tamilnadu Rep.By, The Inspector of Police, Shanarpatti Police Station, Dindigul District.

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

S.SRIMATHY,J TRP

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.17461 of 2025 Date : 13/10/2025 6/6