← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/12/2024allowed

Thangamankani v. The Inspector Of Police

2024-03-25Honourable Mr Justice Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.03.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP CRL.O.P (MD) No.12 of 2024 1.Thangamankani 2.Jeyakumar 3.Theripalam

...Petitioners

vs 1.The Inspector of Police, Srivillipudhur Town Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

Crime No.561 of 2022 2.Ramaraj

...Respondents

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying, to call for the records of the impugned charge sheet in CC.No.132 of 2023 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate - II, Srivilliputhur and quash the same.

For Petitioners : Mr.V.Angusamy For R1 : Mr.M.Veeranthiran Government Advocate (Crl.side) For R2 : Mrs.C.Geetha 1/5

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition had been filed seeking to quash the charge sheet in CC.No.132 of 2023 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate - II, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District. 2.Mr.V.Angusamy, learned Counsel [Enrl.No.486/2010, Mobile No. 93606 79948], who filed Vakalat on behalf of the Petitioners/Accused 1 to 3, Mr.M.Veeranthiran, learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing on behalf of the first Respondent and Mrs.C.Geetha, learned Counsel (Enrl.No.4384/2021, Mobile No.82485 65206], who filed Vakalat on behalf of the second Respondent are present in Court. 3.The learned Counsel for the Petitioners submitted that the Petitioners are arrayed as Accused 1 to 3 in CC.No.132 of 2023 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate - II, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District. Pending trial, the Accused and the de-facto Complainant had arrived at an amicable settlement. A joint compromise memo had also been filed before this Court by the learned Counsel for the Petitioners and the learned Counsel for the second Respondent/de-facto Complainant. 2/5

4.The learned Government Advocate (crl.side), on instructions from the first Respondent, submitted that the compromise arrived at between the parties are bona fide.

5.The first Respondent had also filed a status report, in which, it is stated that during the pendency of the trial proceedings, the accused and the de-facto Complainant had arrived at an amicable settlement. 6.In the light of the status report filed by the first Respondent, the joint compromise memo filed by the parties concerned is recorded. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the Charge Sheet in CC.No.132 of 2023 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate - II, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District is hereby quashed. Internet:Yes./No 25.03.2024 Index:Yes/No mm 3/5

To 1.The Inspector of Police, Srivillipudhur Town Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP , J.

mm CRL.O.P (MD) No.12 of 2024 25.03.2024 5/5