Alagappasamy v. The State Of Tamil Nadu
S.SRIMATHY , J.
Today, this case is listed under the caption "for being mentioned".
2. It is brought to the notice of this Court that some typographical error has crept in the order dated 15.10.2025. In the order copy Crime Number is mentioned as Crime No.140 of 2025, but the correct one is Crime No.289 of 2025 and also the respondent police is mentioned as ''The Inspector of Police, Veerakeralamputhur Police Station, Theni District but correct one is ''The Inspector of Police, Veerakeralamputhur Police Station, Tenkasi District. Therefore the learned counsel for the petitioners made request to make necessary corrections in the said order and for reissue of the order copy.
3. All other conditions imposed on the petitioners shall remain intact except for the above said correction.
4. Registry is directed to carry-out the necessary corrections in the order dated 15.10.2025 in Crl.OP(MD).No.17914 of 2025 and issue fresh order copy to the learned counsel for the petitioners.
17.10.2025 msrm Note: Issue order copy on 17.10.2025.
1/7
S.SRIMATHY , J.
msrm 17.10.2025 2/7
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 15.10.2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD)No.17914 of 2025
1. Alagappasamy
2. Ganesan
3. Venkatesan ... Petitioners/ Accused Nos.1 to 3 Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Veerakeralamputhur Police Station, Theni District.
(Crime No.140 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.A.Ananda Raj For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.140 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 3/7
26.09.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 308(4), 191(2), 191(3), 61(2) of BNS and 25(1)(a) of Arms Act, in Crime No.140 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seek bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that, due to a land dispute, the petitioners waylaid the defacto complainant and one of them raised a sick high and swung it at him. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent person and they have not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioners are in judicial custody from 26.09.2025. Hence, he seeks bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that there was no injury and that no previous cases are pending against the petitioners.
5. Taking into consideration the fact that there was no injury and also considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners, subject to the following conditions: 4/7
6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned learned Judicial Magistrate, Alangulam, and on further conditions that :- [a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity.
[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. They have to co-operate for the investigation.
[c] the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
5/7
[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.
(S S Y J) 15.10.2025 jbr To
1. The Judicial Magistrate, Alangulam.
2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Palayamkottai.
3. The Inspector of Police, Veerakeralamputhur Police Station, Theni District.
4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
6/7
S.SRIMATHY,J.
jbr
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.17914 of 2025 Date : 15.10.2025 7/7