← Library
Madras High Court/18167/2025granted

Senthil Alais Senthilkumar v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep.By

2025-10-17Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17-10-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD) NO. 18167 of 2025

1. Senthil alais Senthilkumar

2. NALLATHAMBI (THANGAM) ALAIS NALLATHAMBI Petitioner(s) Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep.by The Inspector of Police Thazhamuthunagar Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

(Crime No.655 of 2025) Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.R.Kannappan For Respondent(s): Mr.S.S.Manoj, Government Advocate (Crl.side) Prayer:

C-33AB For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.655 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police ORDER: The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 329(3), 296(b), 351(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 3(1) of TN Public Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act, 1992, in Crime No.655 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that on 18.09.2025, due to property dispute, the petitioners and other accused trespassed into the defacto complainant's office premises and damaged the articles worth about Rs.1000/-. Hence, the apprehension of arrest. Hence, a case has been registered as against the petitioners.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and they have not committed any offence. He seeks this Court to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the offences committed by the petitioners are serious in nature. Further, there is one previous case each against the petitioners.

5.Considering the fact that it is a dispute regarding land, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thoothukudi, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on further conditions that: [a]the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity.

[b]the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required. [c]the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d]the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

17-10-2025 Tmg To 1.The Inspector of Police, Thazhamuthunagar Police Station, Thoothukudi District. 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3. The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thoothukudi.