Mr. R. Hariharasudhan, v. The District Revenue Officer,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.10.2016 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN W.P.(MD)No.1373 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.3 of 2011

1. R.Hariharasudhan

2. R.Vidyaletuchumi .. Petitioners Vs.

1. The District Revenue Officer, Madurai, Madurai District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai, Madurai District.

3. The Thasildar, Madurai North, Madurai District.

4. C.Periyanayagam

5. C.Chinnanthan

6. C.Paulraj

7. C.Saminathan

8. C.Moorthi

9. C.Karikalan .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order in Ni.Mu.No.5514/2009(N), dated 23.03.2010 on the file of the respondent No.2 and quash the same as illegal and consequently, to direct the respondent No.3 to cancel the Patta issued in favour of the respondents Nos.4 to 9.

For Petitioners : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy For R-1 to R-3 : Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah Government Advocate For R-4,R-6&R-7 : Mr.S.Thangaraj For R-5,R-8&R-9 : Dismissed as per Order dated 08.03.12

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that this Writ Petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(RTI) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To

1. The District Revenue Officer, Madurai, Madurai District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai, Madurai District.

3. The Thasildar, Madurai North, Madurai District. pmu RL/4C/2P/SKS/RR/1.12.2016 W.P.(MD)No.1373 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.3 of 2011 05.10.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/