Renuga, v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Karur Town

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 17.10.2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY 1.Renuga

2. Harini ... Petitioners/Accused Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep By The Inspector of Police, Karur Town Police Station, Karur.

(Crime No.873 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.S.Krishnan, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No.873 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

1/6

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 296(b), 115(2), 324(4), 351(2) of BNS 2023, in Crime No.873 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners along with other accused persons have damaged the property of the defacto complainant and threatened him with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they are no way connected with the alleged occurrence as stated by the prosecution. He further submitted that there was a civil dispute pending between them, a false case has been given. He further submitted that the petitioners are ready and willing to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seek anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

2/6

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) submitted that there are four previous cases pending against the 1st petitioner and there is no previous case pending against the 2nd petitioner. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that there was a civil dispute pending between them, the defacto complainant had also preferred a suit in O.S.No.185 of 2025 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Karur. Further, there are four previous cases pending against the 1st petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the 1st petitioner. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as against the 1st petitioner. There is no previous case pending against the 2nd petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the 2nd petitioner, with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the 2nd petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned 3/6

Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Karur, on condition that the 2nd petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Karur, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

(a) the 2nd petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b ) the 2nd petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation; (c) the 2nd petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (d) the 2nd petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

4/6

(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the 2nd petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the 2nd petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560] and; (f) if the accused/petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS, 2023. (S S Y J) 17.10.2025 msrm To 1.The Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Karur.

2.The Inspector of Police, Karur Town Police Station, Karur.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

S.SRIMATHY, J.

msrm

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.18260 of 2025 Date : 17.10.2025 6/6