N.Rajendran v. The District Collector,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.10.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU and WMP(MD).Nos.23400 & 23402 of 2025 N.Rajendran
...Petitioner
Vs
1. The District Collector, Madurai District Collectorate Campus Madurai -625 020.
2. The Superintendent of Police Madurai District Surveyor Colony Alagar Kovil Road Madurai - 625 007.
3. The Inspector of Police Karuppayurani Police Station Pandi Kovil
4. The Tahsildar 1/6
5. The Firka Surveyor Sakkimangalam Firka
6. The Village Administrative Officer Aandarkottaram Village
7. S.Kamalanathan ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other Order or Directions in the nature of Writ Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to initiate appropriate enquiry and to proceed disciplinary action against the 3 to 6 respondents as contemplated under Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules 1973 for violation of the specific observations of the Honourable Court passed in W.P.(MD).No.18810 of 2025 dated 11.07.2025 and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.
For Petitioner : M/s.S.Chandrasekaran For Respondent Nos.1 to 6 : Mr.P.B.Ahamed Yasmin Parvin Government Advocate 2/6
O R D E R
This writ petition has been filed seeking direction to the 1st and 2nd respondents to initiate appropriate enquiry and to proceed disciplinary action against the 3 to 6 respondents as contemplated under Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules 1973 for violation of the specific observations of the Honourable Court passed in W.P. (MD).No.18810 of 2025 dated 11.07.2025.
2. It is well settled that a third party, not connected with any service dispute, can invoke the provisions of Article 226 of the Constitution of India to seek a mandamus to take action against any employee or official. Disciplinary proceedings is essential matter between employer and the employee and a stranger particularly, a person who was the complainant which led to a criminal case, cannot claim to initiate departmental action. The said principal has been laid down by the Honb'le Apex Court in the case of Ranjith Prasad Vs. Union of India (UoI) and Ors., reported in AIR 2000 SC 3469. 3/6
3. In view of the same, the prayer as sought for by the writ petitioner cannot be entertained by this Court.
4. Accordingly, this Writ petition stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
27.10.2025 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no gvn 4/6
To:
1. The District Collector, Madurai District Collectorate Campus Madurai -625 020.
2. The Superintendent of Police Madurai District Surveyor Colony Alagar Kovil Road Madurai - 625 007.
3. The Inspector of Police Karuppayurani Police Station Pandi Kovil
4. The Tahsildar
5. The Firka Surveyor Sakkimangalam Firka
6. The Village Administrative Officer Aandarkottaram Village 5/6
K.KUMARESH BABU , J.
gvn W.P.(MD).No.30262 of 2025 27.10.2025 6/6