Madras High CourtWA(MD)/1303/2013disposed of

Thangadurai, v. The Superintendent Of Police,

2018-07-18Honourable Mr Justice K. Ravichandrabaabu,Honourable Mrs Justice T. Krishnavalli (Retd.)2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.07.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.KRISHNAVALLI W.A(MD)NO.1303 OF 2013 Thangadurai :Appellant/Petitioner .vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nanguneri, Tirunelveli District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Kalakkadu Police Station, Kalakkadu, Tirunelveli District.

: Respondents/Respondents PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent praying this Court to set aside the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.15066 of 2013, dated 12.09.2013.

Prayer in WP(MD). 15066/ 2013 :

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to remove the petitioners name from the rowdy sheet maintained by the 3rd respondent within the stipulated time fixed by this court.

For Appellant :M/s.T.A.Ebenezer For Respondents :Mr.K.Mu.Muthu Addl.Govt.Pleader

JUDGMENT

[Judgment of the Court was made by K.RAVICHANDRABAABU,J.] This Writ Appeal is directed against the order of the Writ Court in dismissing the Writ Petition filed by the appellant herein seeking for a mandamus directing the respondents to remove the Petitioner's name from the rowdy sheet maintained by the third respondent.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.After admitting this Writ Appeal on 11.12.2013, the same is listed today for further hearing. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted before us that during the pendency of the Writ Appeal, the name of the Writ Petitioner is removed from the rowdy list by issuing proceedings dated 1.1.2018, w.e.f. 31.12.2017, as there was no adverse remarks for the past one decade. He has also produced a copy of the said proceedings. The learned counsel for the appellant is not disputing the said fact.

3.Considering the above-said subsequent development that had taken place after filing the Writ Appeal, nothing survives in this Writ Appeal to be adjudicated upon further. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(P&A) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-I) To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nanguneri, Tirunelveli District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Kalakkadu Police Station, Kalakkadu, Tirunelveli District.

+1cc to M/S.T.A.Ebenezer, Advocate SR.No. 73700 +1cc to Special Government Pleader, SR.No. 73512 JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A(MD)NO.1303 OF 2013 18.07.2018 vsn JM/SV/SAR 1/27.07.2018/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/