Velmurugan v. The State Of Tamilnadu, Rep. By Its The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 27.10.2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD)No.18621 of 2025 Velmurugan ... Petitioner/ Accused No.1 Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Kulasekharan Police Station, Nagercoil, Kanniyakumari District.

(Crime No.258 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.M.Subash Babu for M/S.Subash Law Office For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.258 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

1/6

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 15.09.2025 for the offences punishable under Section 108 of BNS, Act, in Crime No.258 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is alleged to have contacted one Ramani, a widow, and falsely promised to marry her. However, the petitioner subsequently married another woman. When Ramani came to know of this, she went to the petitioner's house, where all the accused persons abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and threatened her. As a result, Ramani consumed poison and committed suicide. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 15.09.2025. Hence, he seeks bail to the 2/6

petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner deceived one Ramani, a widow, with a false promise of marriage, and upon being abused and threatened by the accused, she consumed poison and died. Therefore, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Padmanabhapuram, and on further conditions that :- 3/6

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. He has to co-operate for the investigation.

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

4/6

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

(S S Y J) 27.10.2025 jbr To

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Padmanabhapuram.

2. The Superintendent, District Prison, Nagercoil.

3. The Inspector of Police, Kulasekharan Police Station, Nagercoil, Kanniyakumari District.

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

S.SRIMATHY,J.

jbr

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.18621 of 2025 Date : 27.10.2025 6/6