← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/1762/2011disposed of

S.A.Rajagopalan v. Syndicate Bank

2015-04-17Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr Justice S. Manikumar2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.04.2015

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Mr.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR W.P.(MD)No.1762 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2011 S.A.Rajagopalan ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Syndicate Bank, Rep.by its General Manager, Regional Office, First Floor No.69, Armenian Street, Chennai 600 001.

2.The State Level Caste Scrutiny Committee, Rep.by its Secretary to Government, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

... Respondents PRAYER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the respondent in Ref.No.286/ROCH/PCOS/227823/2010, dated 24.03.2010 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to disburse the terminal benefits of the petitioner along with reasonable interest. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Suresh Kumar For Respondents : Mr.K.R.Laxman for R1 Mr.M.Govindan, Spl.G.P.for R2

ORDER

(Order of this Court was made by THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE) The petitioner is aggrieved by the non-release of his terminal benefits by the first respondent/Bank, based on the plea that the issue of validity of the community certificate issued to the petitioner was in question and a finding was arrived at against the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.Learned counsel for the petitioner states that subsequently, through a judicial verdict, the matter was remitted back for consideration by the second respondent/Committee and it is only recently, vide order dated 20.03.2015, the petitioner has succeeded in establishing his status as a member of the Scheduled Tribe Community. A copy of this order has been produced in Court and handed over to the learned counsel for the first respondent/Bank.

3.In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the first respondent/Bank submits that the matter would be revisited and a decision, in accordance with law, would be taken within a maximum period of two months from today subject to the petitioner producing the Original Certificate 4.Petition is disposed of, in terms aforesaid. No order as to costs. Consequently, connected M.P. is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AE) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Secretary to Government, State Level Cast Scrutiny Committee, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

2. The General Manager, Syndicate Bank, Regional Office, First Floor No.69, Armenian Street, Chennai 600 001.

+1cc to Mr.M.SURESH KUMAR, Advocate, in SR. No. 19958 +1cc to Mr.K.R.LAXMAN, Advocate, in SR. No. 19519 +1cc to Special Government Pleader, in SR No. 19914 TS/08.05.2015/2P-6C W.P.(MD)No.1762 of 2011 17.04.2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/