Sudha Lakshmi v. The District Collector

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:28.06.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.(MD)No.2088 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011 Sudha Lakshmi : Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Planning Officer, Child Development Planning Office, Tirunelveli.

3.Child Development Planning Officer, Valliyur.

4.Radhi Bala : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records by the first respondent, dated 25.11.2008 in Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.2790/A1/2008 to quash the same and to direct the first respondent to appoint the petitioner to the said Post. For petitioner :Mr.M.R.Srinivasan For R-1 to R-3 :Mr.G.Muthukannan Government Advocate For R-4 :Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner has given a letter to the registry seeking withdrawal of the Writ petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is posted today under the caption 'for withdrawal'.

2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as evident from the letter dated 27.06.2016, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/ Assistant Registrar(CS-II) /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Planning Officer, Child Development Planning Office, Tirunelveli.

3.Child Development Planning Officer, Valliyur.

+1cc to M/S.M.R.SRINIVASAN, Advocate in SR.No.33415 W.P.(MD)No.2088 of 2011 03.06.2016 pm PA/GSV-PM/SAR III/28.06.2016/2P/5C (IT) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/