Madras High CourtWP(MD)/2433/2011closed

A.R.Malaichamy v. The Director General Of

2017-08-07Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.08.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM W.P.(MD)No.2433 of 2011 and MP(MD)No.1 of 2011 A.R.Malaichamy : Petitioner -vs1.The Director General of Police, Chennai.

2.The Inspector General of Police, South Zone, Race Course Road, Madurai.

3.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai.

4.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

5.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Oomachikulam, Madurai District.

6.The District Social Welfare Officer, Madurai District, Madurai.

7.The Inspector of Police, Paramakudi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

8.The Inspector of Police, Karuppayurani Police Station, Madurai District.

9.The Inspector of Police, Anna Nagar Police Station, Madurai City.

10.Kayalvizhi 11.Selvakumar : Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 5 to 9 from interfering in the civil dispute between the petitioner and the respondents 10 and 11. For Petitioner : Mr.R.M.Arun Swaminathan For R1 to R9 : Mr.G.Muthukannan Government Advocate For R10 and R11 : No appearance

O R D E R

The prayer sought for in this writ petition is to direct the respondents 5 to 9 from interfering in the civil dispute between the petitioner and the respondents 10 and 11. 2.Mr.R.M.Arun Swaminathan, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the 10th respondent is none other than the daughter of the petitioner and the 11th respondent is his son-inlaw. The 9th respondent married the 10th respondent in a love affairs and subsequently, made so many complaints against the petitioner and now, the official respondents interfering in the civil dispute and hence, the present writ petition. 3.Mr.C.Muthukannan, learned Government Advocate, on instructions, would submit that the official respondents were not interfering in the civil dispute of the petitioner with his daughter and his son-in-law.

4.In view of the submission of the learned Government Advocate, this writ petition is closed as no further adjudication is necessary in this case. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar

To, 1.The Director General of Police, Chennai.