Madras High CourtWP(MD)/3125/2011dismissed

K.Suresh Babu v. The Principal Chief Engineer

2017-12-11Honourable Mrs Justice V.Bhavani Subbaroyan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:11.12.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN W.P.(MD)No.3125 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 K.Suresh Babu ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Principal Chief Engineer, Water Resources Organisation, PWD, Chepauk, Chennai-5.

2.The Superintending Engineer, Water Resources Organisation, Vaiparu Basin Taluk, Virudhunagar.

3.The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Organisation, PWD, Madurai Division, Madurai - 2.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the second respondent in his proceedings letter No.A2/3046/07 (4081) Napa 10A, dated 26.11.2007 and quash the same and direct the second respondent to appoint the petitioner on the compassionate ground.

For Petitioner : M/s.M.D.Devi Saravana Priya For Respondents : Mr.V.Muruganantham Additional Government Pleader.

***

O R D E R

This petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the second respondent in his proceedings letter No.A2/3046/07 (4081) Napa.10-A dated 26.11.2007 and quash the same and direct the second respondent to appoint the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. In this writ petition the counter affidavit has been filed by the second respondent wherein it is stated that the second respondent had infact recommended the case of the petitioner to the third respondent for providing appointment on compassionate appointment.

However the third respondent in his letter No.C4/16914/2007, dated 12.11.2007, returning the said proposal stating that the application of the petitioner was not received in the Department well within the prescribed period as per G.O.Ms.No.120, Labour and Employment Training Department, dated 29.06.1995.

3. Based on the counter filed by the second respondent, it is seen that the petitioner has made a representation beyond the time limit prescribed. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant any order.

4. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Principal Chief Engineer, Water Resources Organisation, PWD, Chepauk, Chennai-5.

2.The Superintending Engineer, Water Resources Organisation, Vaiparu Basin Taluk, Virudhunagar.

3.The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Organisation, PWD, Madurai Division, Madurai - 2.

+ 1 CC TO THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER IN SR.NO.92210 KMI AK/JC/SAR3/24.05.2018/2P/5C W.P.(MD)No.3125 of 2011 11.12.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/