Madras High CourtWP(MD)/1213/2013disposed of

M. Ramu, v. The District Collector

2015-08-12Honourable Ms.Justice V.M.Velumani,Honourable Mr Justice R. Sudhakar2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.08.2015 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Writ Petition (MD) No.1213 of 2013 and MP(MD)No. 1 of 2013 M.Ramu ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Tahsildar, Thiruchuli Taluk, Thiruchuli, Virudhunagar District.

4.The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat) Thiruchuli Union, M.Rediyapatti, Virudhunagar District.

5.The President, K.Chettikulam Panchayat, Paralatchi via, Thiruchuli Union, Virudhunagar District.

...

Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, direct the 5th respondent to implement the order of the 4th respondent s proceedings in Na.Ka.A7/2719/2011 dated 04.04.2012 within stipulated time as may be fixed by this Honourable Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Karthikeyan For Respondents 1-3 : Mr.A.K.Baskarapandian, Special Government Pleader.

For Respondents 4 and 5 : Mr.S.Kumar Additional Government Pleader https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by R.SUDHAKAR,J.) This writ petition has been filed to direct the fifth respondent to implement the order of the fourth respondent dated 04.04.2012. 2.It is seen that the petitioner has already approached the respondents by way of his representation dated 11.12.2012 for the implementation of the order of the fourth respondent dated 04.04.2012. Since no final order has been passed so far, the present writ petition has been filed.

3.Without going into the merits of the petitioner's claim, the fifth respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner on its own merit and in accordance with law. If any third party will be affected by the nature of the relief sought for by the petitioner or by any order to be passed, the authority shall hear such person to avoid the allegations of violation of principles of natural justice. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authority concerned is free to deal with the matter on its own merit as per law.

4.The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Consequently, M.P(MD)No.1 of 2013 is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Tahsildar, Thiruchuli Taluk, Thiruchuli, Virudhunagar District. 4.The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat) Thiruchuli Union, M.Rediyapatti, Virudhunagar District. 5.The President, K.Chettikulam Panchayat, Paralatchi via, Thiruchuli Union, Virudhunagar District. +1cc to M/S. V.Perumal,Advocate in SR.No 45764 +1cc to Special Government Pleader in SR.No. 46319 JAM/25.08.2015/2P - 8C JGB/DP/SAR -I https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Writ Petition (MD) No.1213 of 2013 12.08.2015