Madras High CourtWP(MD)/1260/2013dismissed

Naina Mohammed v. The District Collector

2015-11-17Honourable Mr Justice K. Ravichandrabaabu2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.11.2015

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P.(MD)No.1260 of 2013 Naina Mohammed ...

Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Pudukkottai.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai.

3.The Superintendent of Police, CBCID, Chennai.

4.The Tahsildar, Aranthangi, Pudukkottai District.

5.The Inspector of Police, Aranthangi Police Station, Aranthangi, Pudukkottai District.

6.The Sub Inspector of Police, Nagudi Police Station, Nagudi, Pudukkottai District.

7.Ganesan 8.Meenal 9.Subbiah ...

Respondents PRAYER: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 4th respondent to take appropriate action against the respondents 8 and 9 for violation of various provisions of Tamil Nadu Pawn Brokers Licence Act, 1943. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian For Respondents : Mr.S.Kumar, AGP for R1 to 6 Mr.K.Balasundaram for R7 and 8

O R D E R

The petitioner seeks for a mandamus, directing the 4th respondent to take appropriate action against the respondents 8 and 9 for violation of various provisions of the Tamil Nadu Pawn Brokers Licence Act, 1943.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.This matter is taken up for hearing today after service to the other side.

3.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents submitted that the 4th respondent / Tahsildar, Aranthangi has already passed an order based on the representation of the petitioner in his proceedings Na.Ka.16277/2012/A1, dated NIL.10.2012. He has also produced a copy of the said proceedings. 4.When that being the factual position, I do not think that the prayer in the Writ petition survives any more. Hence, it is for the petitioner to challenge the order passed by the Tahsildar, Aranthangi, if at all he is aggrieved against the same. 5.Accordingly, this Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to challenge the order of the Tahsildar, Aranthangi, in the manner known to law, if at all there is any grievance.

No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AS) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Collector, Pudukkottai.