Purushlee v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, E.Pudur
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 28.11.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN and Crl.M.P(MD)No.16511 of 2025
1. Purushlee,
2. Latha,
3. Raveendran, ... Petitioners Vs.
1. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, E.Pudur Police Station, Trichy City, Crime No.126/2021.
2. John Jerold, ... Respondents PRAYER :- This petition under section 528 BNSS, to call for the records relating to the impugned First Information Report in Crime No.126/2021 on the file of the respondent police dated 17.02.2021 and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.V. Malaiyendran, For Respondents : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 : M/s.S.Paul Murugesh for R2 1/4
ORDER
The petitioners have sought for quashing of the FIR registered for the alleged offences under Sections 417, 419 and 420 I.P.C.
2. The gist of the allegation is that the petitioners, by giving false promises to the defacto complainant and others of securing employment Abroad, cheated them of huge amounts of money and thus, committed the aforesaid offences.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners had returned the amount not only to the defacto complainant but, all the other victims. The petitioners and the second respondent have now entered into a compromise and decided to give a quietus to the entire dispute. The parties have filed a joint compromise memo dated 26.11.2025.
4. The petitioners and the second respondent are present before this Court in person. They are identified by Mr.Udaya Kumaran, Special Sub Inspector of Police, E.Pudur Police Station, Trichy District. All the 2/4
parties confirmed the compromise arrived at between them.
5. Considering the nature of the offences and the relationship between the parties, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned FIR pending investigation. Accordingly, the impugned FIR is quashed in entirety and the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. The joint compromise memo dated 26.11.2025, shall form part and parcel of the order. The petitioners shall jointly pay a cost of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre attached to this Bench and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 28.11.2025 Index: Yes/ No Speaking Order / Non-Speaking Order LS To 1.The Inspector of Police, E.Pudur Police Station, Trichy City.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
3/4
SUNDER MOHAN,J LS 3.The Officer in-charge, Mediation and Conciliation Centre Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
CRL OP(MD) No.19711 of 2025 28.11.2025 4/4